Yes, I completely think it’s a coincidence that David Risch happens to go out wandering. And I mentioned why I don’t think Joan sought help across the street. I said it clearly: I feel it was a situation about which she felt shame, something she did not want exposed. But it’s just a theory, albeit one which makes better sense of the evidence, I think, than some other theories. One can make any two events in life seem like they are causally connected. All one has to do is imagine a linkage. David’s wandering is not like his mother’s wandering since he does not disappear. So the analogy is strained.And now you believe the fire that killed Joan’s parents was caused by a similar mental lapse that you intuit Joan suffered. But it’s complete fabrication. There’s no evidence. I can’t prove or disprove your theory. Without evidence, no one can prove anyone’s theory about this poor woman’s disappearance. All one can do is harumph another person’s theory and if that makes someone feel better, I suppose that is what they should do. Maybe she did survive that day and found a new life. Today it would be impossible to do. But back then, it’s not altogether unthinkable. I would probably say I think it’s about a ninety percent chance she perished that day. But I’d give about a ten percent chance she survived somehow. And the amnesia that pops up in so many cases as a theory is an extremely rare event. It does happen, but much less often than people think. I no longer believe at all that she faked her disappearance. I mean I don’t believe the blood was planted there. I believe she had a real medical crisis.